Lawyers targeting super disputes

superannuation-complaints-tribunal/compliance/financial-planning/funds-management/chief-executive/money-management/

6 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The ability for superannuation disputes to be resolved via conciliation or the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal is being increasingly undermined by the increasing involvement of lawyers.

That is the bottom line of a roundtable recently conducted by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, during which all participants acknowledged that superannuation disputes had become a target area for plaintive law firms.

The roundtable also revealed that the major group insurers had held discussions about the increasing early involvement of lawyers and the manner in which this could erode the ultimate benefit flowing to members.

The chief operating officer of major industry fund REST, Paul Sayer, said the concern was that law firms were advertising and saying, "come to us, you know, no win no fee", when the first exercise that a member should be undertaking was talking to their fund.

Australian Administration Services chief information officer, Tim Buskens, said that whereas lawyers had historically become involved in superannuation disputes in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, they were now emerging from the outset.

"Now we're finding just through our general mail room operations, at the very first stage, the very first letter is generally from a legal firm, and I think that's a shift," he said.

AIA head of group insurance Eleanor Ottaviano said there had been agreement across the industry that there was a need to educate members about the disputes process with respect to insurance.

"We absolutely need to get there and better help members in that process because if at the end of the day the solicitor is really just filling in that form on behalf of the member, and that was going to get paid anyway, what value are they adding to the process and how much are they taking of the member's benefit," she said.

Energy Industry Super chief executive Alex Hutchison agreed that whereas lawyers might once have become involved at the end of the superannuation complaints process, they were increasingly being seen at the beginning.

"Now you see them at the beginning of the process. Are they touting for work? Yes they're touting for work in this area, no different to running ads on financial advice and being subject to poor financial advice in any other type of financial services area," he said.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo