Lawyers targeting super disputes

6 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The ability for superannuation disputes to be resolved via conciliation or the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal is being increasingly undermined by the increasing involvement of lawyers.

That is the bottom line of a roundtable recently conducted by Money Management's sister publication, Super Review, during which all participants acknowledged that superannuation disputes had become a target area for plaintive law firms.

The roundtable also revealed that the major group insurers had held discussions about the increasing early involvement of lawyers and the manner in which this could erode the ultimate benefit flowing to members.

The chief operating officer of major industry fund REST, Paul Sayer, said the concern was that law firms were advertising and saying, "come to us, you know, no win no fee", when the first exercise that a member should be undertaking was talking to their fund.

Australian Administration Services chief information officer, Tim Buskens, said that whereas lawyers had historically become involved in superannuation disputes in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, they were now emerging from the outset.

"Now we're finding just through our general mail room operations, at the very first stage, the very first letter is generally from a legal firm, and I think that's a shift," he said.

AIA head of group insurance Eleanor Ottaviano said there had been agreement across the industry that there was a need to educate members about the disputes process with respect to insurance.

"We absolutely need to get there and better help members in that process because if at the end of the day the solicitor is really just filling in that form on behalf of the member, and that was going to get paid anyway, what value are they adding to the process and how much are they taking of the member's benefit," she said.

Energy Industry Super chief executive Alex Hutchison agreed that whereas lawyers might once have become involved at the end of the superannuation complaints process, they were increasingly being seen at the beginning.

"Now you see them at the beginning of the process. Are they touting for work? Yes they're touting for work in this area, no different to running ads on financial advice and being subject to poor financial advice in any other type of financial services area," he said.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Graeme

FWIW I am a long term holder of both. I am relaxed about my LICs trading at a discount. Part of a cycle. I would like...

6 hours 26 minutes ago
Ross Smith

The term "The democratisation of private assets continues to gain steam" is marketing misleading. There is no democracy...

8 hours 10 minutes ago
Greg

I have passed this exam, and it is not easy or fair exam. It's no wonder that advisers are falsifying their results. ...

3 days 8 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND