IPA questions competitiveness of super system post-PC

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has called for more consideration of whether the inefficiencies of the superannuation system are due to a lack of marketplace competition or structural problems in the wake of the Productivity Commission’s report.

While the group supported the Commission’s recommendation for performance benchmarks around returns, fees, level of service and projected retirement income, IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway, noted that greater price transparency had not led to more competition or greatly reduced fees.

 “Reforms on the demand side especially around the introduction of standardised products and enhanced transparency of information should result in improved efficiency and innovation in product development,” Conway also said.

Related News:

“However, competition and efficiency may not always be synonymous as competition which means spending on marketing to gain new members with a focus on profit-making may not improve efficiency.”

The group also argued for attention to be paid to improving financial literacy, as this would improve member engagement which should in turn enhance competition.




Related Content

Don’t incentivise planners via commission rebates says ISA

Government proposals to rebate grandfathered commissions to clients via product providers would represent a significant abrogation of one of the key r...Read more

Labor favours APRA-regulated funds over SMSFs: SMSFA

Self-funded retirees are being discriminated against by the Labor Party, which confirmed on Friday that it would abolish franking credit rebates ...Read more

More change ahead for superannuation governance

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned that, while the 2013 prudential framework has led to some improved practices across t...Read more

Author

Comments

Add new comment