IPA questions competitiveness of super system post-PC

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has called for more consideration of whether the inefficiencies of the superannuation system are due to a lack of marketplace competition or structural problems in the wake of the Productivity Commission’s report.

While the group supported the Commission’s recommendation for performance benchmarks around returns, fees, level of service and projected retirement income, IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway, noted that greater price transparency had not led to more competition or greatly reduced fees.

 “Reforms on the demand side especially around the introduction of standardised products and enhanced transparency of information should result in improved efficiency and innovation in product development,” Conway also said.

Related News:

“However, competition and efficiency may not always be synonymous as competition which means spending on marketing to gain new members with a focus on profit-making may not improve efficiency.”

The group also argued for attention to be paid to improving financial literacy, as this would improve member engagement which should in turn enhance competition.

Related Content

Quarterly super payments costing workers $225 million

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has continued its campaign for superannuation to be paid more frequently, saying that Australians are missing out on ar...Read more

Super funds will struggle to meet Govt deadline

Superannuation funds are unlikely to be able to meet the deadline for implementing some of the Government’s key legislative changes to superannu...Read more

FSC welcomes passage of superannuation bill

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has welcomed the Senate’s passage of superannuation bills which will reduce fees charged on low balance MyS...Read more



Add new comment