IPA questions competitiveness of super system post-PC

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has called for more consideration of whether the inefficiencies of the superannuation system are due to a lack of marketplace competition or structural problems in the wake of the Productivity Commission’s report.

While the group supported the Commission’s recommendation for performance benchmarks around returns, fees, level of service and projected retirement income, IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway, noted that greater price transparency had not led to more competition or greatly reduced fees.

 “Reforms on the demand side especially around the introduction of standardised products and enhanced transparency of information should result in improved efficiency and innovation in product development,” Conway also said.

Related News:

“However, competition and efficiency may not always be synonymous as competition which means spending on marketing to gain new members with a focus on profit-making may not improve efficiency.”

The group also argued for attention to be paid to improving financial literacy, as this would improve member engagement which should in turn enhance competition.

Related Content

Expansion beyond super fund sectors brings positive results for Frontier Advisors

The expansion of their client base beyond the superannuation industry has helped asset consulting firm, Frontier Advisors, to achieve the highest scor...Read more

Planner’s actions no excuse for super fund member’s insurance lapse

The fact that a financial planner filled in a superannuation fund application form and associated insurance documentation on behalf of a client did no...Read more

Gov to introduce a super consumer advocate

The Federal Government will establish a superannuation consumer advocate and has asked the Treasury to recommend a potential provider following a call...Read more



Add new comment