Industry pushes back on insurance inside super

9 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government is facing significant push-back from both the superannuation and insurance industries over its Budget announcement allowing low balance holders under 25 to opt out of insurance inside superannuation.

Virtually all elements of the superannuation industry have warned that the Budget measure comes at the risk of leaving a significant cohort of younger workers under-insured, while the Financial Planning Association (FPA) has suggested that opting out of insurance inside superannuation should not occur without people being given the opportunity to access advice.

Deloitte head of superannuation, Russell Mason set the tone of the superannuation industry concerns when he said there was a risk that a lot of people would become unintentionally uninsured.

“Younger members with dependents may well become inadvertently uninsured,” he said.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) also expressed concern, noting the Budget measure could be particularly dangerous for those in high-risk occupations.

ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy said the Budget shift to an opt-in model would put insurance coverage at risk for many young people who had dependents and financial commitments.

The Financial Services Council (FSC) chief executive, Sally Loane also warned that the policy shift could see younger Australians slipping through the safety net.

“It will be incumbent on superannuation fund trustees, particularly those in the default system, to engage and communicate more effectively with their under-25-year-old members to ensure they understand the implications of the policy change,” she said.

Even before the Budget had been handed down, specialist lawyer, Paul Watson said that while he welcomed reports the Government intended to legislate to make insurance in super opt-in for people under 25, he was concerned that disability insurance cover was also being removed.

He said that death insurance had historically been poorly targeted for under 25s because they did not usually have financial dependents or mortgages, but they did suffer from disabilities and injuries which could prevent them from working.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 22 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 23 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND