Industry presents united front on retaining LISC

6 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The superannuation industry has presented a united front to the Government on the need to retain the Low Income Superannuation Contribution (LISC), with both the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) and the Australian Institute of Super Trustees (AIST) saying it should survive the removal of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.

An ASFA submission to the Treasury has gone so far as to argue that retention of the LISC is more important in equity terms than the on-time delivery of the increase in superannuation guarantee.

The ASFA submission, signed by the organisation's chief executive, Pauline Vamos, suggests the Government should resort to other means of funding the LISC, in circumstances where the superannuation co-contribution regime will be insufficient to offset the inequity with respect to low income earners.

"ASFA does not consider that the Superannuation Co-contribution is sufficient to address the

inequity of low income earners paying too much tax on their concessional contributions," it said. "The co-contribution only applies in regard to voluntary, non-concessional contributions made as a

discretionary spend from after tax income."

The submission claimed that only around one million individuals qualified for the co-contribution each

year, with a substantial proportion of those qualifying having incomes over $37,000.

"ASFA considers that while the co-contribution serves a purpose in encouraging voluntary contributions as a matter of equity, building confidence and ensuring that low income earners can top up their age pensions adequately requires the LISC to be maintained," it said.

The submission said that in regard to the relative impact of the two superannuation measures in the Government's legislation, the removal of the LISC "has a much bigger impact in absolute terms for the workers concerned, although clearly the pause in the SG affects more employees".

"As such, while ASFA does not support either proposed measure, we have particular concerns with the proposed abolition of the LISC and recommend strongly that this be reconsidered," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

4 days 13 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 4 days ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 4 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND