Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Industry fund trustees “not double dipping”

compliance/boards/industry-funds/conflicts-of-interest/

15 December 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) has denied that any conflict of interest exists with respect to unions receiving payment from industry superannuation funds for the time union officials serve on super fund boards.

The ACTU has issued the denial in the fact of reports published in The Australian newspaper which pointed to $5.4 million in fees being directed towards trade unions by industry funds — something which the peak union body also claims does not represent a money making exercise for the unions involved.

"The ACTU, and unions who appoint directors, do not make money from the appointment process. It is, by and large, a reimbursement process," an ACTU letter to the newspaper said. "In all practical terms, this is not a conflict of interest."

The newspaper's report has caused a certain amount of controversy because its allegations coincide with the Senate having rejected Government legislation which would have seen superannuation funds required to appoint a minimum one-third independent directors inclusive of an independent chairman.

The ACTU's letter said that unions, as "50 per cent owners of trustee companies, are entitled to appoint officials as trustees".

"When these appointments are made, the Unions allow employees to take time away from their regular duties to attend to the role of trustee/director," it said. "Rather than having an unnecessary complication of the employee having two employment contracts (one with the union and one with the fund) and for administrative ease, the fund pays the union the pre-determined director's fee as a compensation for the time the official spends in undertaking their superannuation director's role."

The ACTU letter claimed this was "neither an unusual or complex feature".

The ACTU went on to say that whilst it was a matter for each Union and the relevant Official, "there should be no suggestion that the union officials appointed by the ACTU as trustee directors are double dipping — in the case of the ACTU, the fee is paid to the organisation because this is where release from the regular job occurs. The official does not personally receive a wage and the director fees".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 weeks ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

4 weeks 1 day ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3