Has the Govt eroded incentives for super saving?

The Government’s changes to superannuation have gone too far and there are no incentives left in the system to attract taxpayers to save about the compulsory contribution rate, according to specialist financial services consultancy, Pitcher Partners.

In a pre-Budget submission filed with the Federal Treasury, Pitcher Partners said numerous changes have been made to the superannuation system which had had the effect of “significantly reducing the attractiveness of using the superannuation system to fund retirement”.

“We highlight that we believe the changes have gone too far and now there are no incentives left in the system to attract taxpayers to save above the compulsory contribution rate,” it said. “Some of these policies include the reduced deductible contribution cap of $25,000 per year, the $1.6 million pension cap, and the 30 per cent contribution tax rate applicable to individuals deriving more than $250,000 per annum. “

Related News:

“We are concerned that the outcome of these significant policy changes, which collectively eliminate most of the voluntary savings incentives from the super system, will be to discourage retirement savings from those taxpayers with the capacity to save.”

“Over time, we believe that this will create a new class of taxpayer with insufficient savings to self-fund their retirement who will qualify for, and need to rely on, the age pension,” the Pitcher Partners submission said.

It said that, on this basis, it was strongly encouraging the Government to reintroduce voluntary savings incentives back into the system as well as encouraging middle income earners to use those incentives to self-fund their retirement.

The submission said these policy changes could include increasing the deductible contribution cap from $25,000 to $50,000; providing flexibility by allowing individuals to determine their deductible contribution cap by taking into account unutilised amounts from prior years; pooling thresholds and limits within families (e.g. allowing couples two times the pension cap that can be used between the couple in any way they choose); increasing both the total superannuation balance threshold where non-concessional contributions are prohibited and the transfer balance cap amounts from $1.6 million to double those amounts; increasing the threshold where the 30 per cent contributions tax rate applies to at least $300,000 and indexing that threshold to wages growth.




Related Content

Greens would compel banks out of wealth management

The major banks would be made to divest their interests in financial planning and financial planners would have to be individually licensed under...Read more

How does MySuper stack up against other options?

With new research showing that a significant majority of super fund members don’t swap out of MySuper options, Money Management looked at data from ...Read more

Quarterly super payments costing workers $225 million

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has continued its campaign for superannuation to be paid more frequently, saying that Australians are missing out on ar...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Totally agree with the sentiment here. I'm already hearing stories of retirees sqandering their savings just so that they can qualify for at least a part pension and the addition benefits that come with it. Sure, there needs to be a fair balance, but the current caps on contributions and pension lump sums are not good policy. The thing is, Bill Shorten wants to make it even less attractive. Madness!

My first impression is that Pitcher Partners are out of touch with the reality faced by the vast majority of Australians. What percentage of people can consistently contribute $25,000 per year into Super, will accumulate $1.6 million in Super (in today's dollars) or earn $250,000 per year? It is laughable to believe that Super is not an extremely effective environment to accumulate retirement savings. I strongly support the changes that Pitcher Partners are criticising, as it is only the wealthiest top few percent who would benefit from making their recommended changes. And I for one do not agree that tax payers should be further subsidising the wealthiest few percent of Australians.

Only top few percent that can get $25,000 into super per year (including employer contributions)...?

How out of touch with reality are you. I see everyday people making additional salary sacrifice contributions all the time... These extra contributions help them be less of a burden on the taxpayer in future, if at all. We need people to make these contributions for the sustainability of our age pension system.

Add new comment