Grattan super paper “insulting and demeaning”

Association-of-Superannuation-Funds-of-Australia/Grattan-Institute/superannuation/

12 February 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has spoken out against the Grattan Institute’s latest superannuation policy paper, saying it was “replete with Victorian era proposals to fix the gender gap in Australian retirement incomes.”

The Institute’s paper proposed rental assistance to age pensioners occupying a low-income demographic. It did not address increases the superannuation guarantee (SG).

Martin Fahy, ASFA chief executive, said that this approach offered a “fatalistic view of the future earnings of women and low paid workers and condemned them from an early age to poverty in retirement.”

He said that the reality was the lifting the SG quickly as the most effective solution to improve women’s retirements, and in refusing to acknowledge that, the paper was “simply Grattan having another go at super.”

The proposals to offer age pensioners on rent assistance additional assistance would not lift women’s long-term prospects of having a decent retirement.

“The age pension and rent assistance alone cannot provide an adequate or acceptable retirement for Australians. The paper misses the reality of retirement living costs in Australia and the aspirations of the community to live comfortably, not just survive, in retirement,” Fahy said.

He said the proposal would only cost the Government around $140 million a year, and so should be considered on its own merits within the Budget rather than as a solution to superannuation inequity.

Fahy also said that the paper reduced wage determination to trade-off between wage increases and super.

“This is an oversimplification,” he said. “In the current wage bargaining environment, it is unlikely that forgone SG increases would translate directly into wage increases.”

He said that rather than focusing on saving Budget money in the short-term, the Institute should instead have focused on intergenerational challenges, such as the gender pay gap and disparities in the allocation of home and family duties.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months 4 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months 4 weeks ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Ahead of the 1 January 2026 education deadline for advisers, ASIC has issued its ‘final warning’ to the industry, reporting that more than 2,300 relevant providers could ...

5 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

1 day 13 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo