Govt’s super changes could defeat best interests

government/Budget/superannuation-funds/

31 May 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Low balance superannuation fund members may be left worse off if the Government proceeds with legislation which would compulsorily shift their accounts to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In doing so, the Government may be acting against members’ best interests.

In a submission to the Treasury, ASFA has pointed to an analysis of the relative performance of low balance accounts within superannuation funds compared to those held by the ATO and warned that members could be left worse off.

“We consider that there needs to be careful consideration over whether it is in a member’s best interest to transfer off low balance accounts when the member only has one account and no alternative active account to which the inactive account could be transferred,” it said.

“ASFA has conducted analysis into the relative performance of low balance accounts compared with those held by the ATO and we have found that for members with balances below $6,000 they are likely to be better off if their account remains with a fund due to the higher investment returns.”

ASFA argued that members should be able to elect to maintain low balance accounts if they wish and for reasons other than maintaining an insurance benefit.

It also argued that 13 months was a relatively short time-frame for the determination of inactivity in a low-balance account and that members might have perfectly straightforward reasons for such inactivity, including maternity leave, carers’ leave and extended leave for travel or study.

“On the assumption that lack of contributions will be the primary determinant of inactivity the 13 months should be extended to two years and we note that the Productivity Commission’s draft report recommends that the lost inactivity threshold be set at two years,” the submission said. “This timeframe would provide greater assurance that the member is genuinely lost or disengaged.”

Elsewhere in its submission, ASFA pointed to the ATO’s ability to consolidate superannuation into active accounts and said this represented a compelling reason for the ATO to move the money directly from an inactive account to an active account rather than going to the ATO.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo