Don't over-complicate superannuation privacy

2 October 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds should be permitted to 'bundle' consent by their members to provide information covered by the Privacy Act, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). 

In a submission filed with the Privacy Commission dealing with the draft Australian Privacy Principles, ASFA has argued that the 'bundling' of consents is often necessary in practice for superannuation funds to prevent confusion, inconvenience and inefficiencies. 

"In the superannuation industry (and, indeed, the broader financial services industry), a provider will typically collect some relatively commonplace items of personal information, which are then used and/or disclosed for a number of different purposes, many of which are required or authorised by law," the submission said.

"In carrying out these purposes, the provider may need to disclose the information to a range of outsourced service providers - for example, administration ('back-office') service providers, insurers, actuaries, technology providers, mail-houses, regulators and complaints handling bodies and, in relation to members who seek to roll over their benefit, other superannuation funds." 

The ASFA submission said it was currently common practice for the provider to obtain a single, 'bundled' consent to the collection of such information. 

"Requiring the provider to request separate consents - in effect purporting to allow the member to 'pick and choose' the uses and/or disclosures for which they will consent - is highly impractical, for a number of reasons," it said.  

"In some cases, the member may attempt to withhold their consent to the collection of information that is required or authorised by law, which is likely to cause confusion.

"It would significantly increase the length and complexity of the collection notification; It would require the provider to develop and maintain the capacity to record and store multiple consents for individual items of personal information." 

Originally published on SMSF Essentials.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

23 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

23 hours 32 minutes ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND