Board independence doesn’t equal performance

boards/independent-directors/superannuation/

16 March 2016
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

There is little empirical evidence to suggest that board member independence in the superannuation system would boost investment performance but it could contribute to maintaining the legitimacy of the super system, a new study suggested.

The Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR) released a study, which said that the ‘evidence' of improved investment performance from good governance in the super and pension sector relies mainly on the higher cost structures sometimes evident where trustees employ related parties to help with the administration of the fund.

However, Dr Scott Donald from the University of New South Wales, who authored the study with Suzanne Le Mire of the University of Adelaide, said the lack of evidence of superior investment performance should not mean the idea of independence should be dismissed.

The absence of evidence (in either direction) should not, however, be seen as fatal as independence does support good decision making which is essential in superannuation governance," Dr Donald said.

"Independence also offers a number of other potential advantages that have not been fully explored in the superannuation debate. This includes the potential to enhance legitimacy of a system in which stakeholders are forced to participate but in which they may feel under-prepared or disempowered."

The paper concluded that the government should formulate a more sophisticated, nuanced, and more compelling argument justifying the establishment of structural independence on super fund boards than it has in the past as this could contribute positively to enhancing decision processes.

One of the approaches that should be taken when regulating for independence is imposing specific structural barriers that spot and forbid connections that could threaten or be inconsistent with independence in order to ensure independence.

But the paper warned it would be difficult to identify potentially threatening relationships, and the appointed person's independence may become questionable only after their appointment.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 8 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo