ASIC insurance inside super report reveals ‘confused and overwhelmed’ members

20 November 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The usability of insurance inside superannuation has been marked down by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with the regulator releasing a consumer research report which reported a third of people found it complex and difficult. 

The findings of the research has been published in ASIC Report 673 which pointed to the better understanding of those who obtained insurance via a financial adviser. 

Where insurance inside superannuation was concerned, it stated that: “After interacting with their fund, about a third of the participants spontaneously reported that they felt confused, overwhelmed or uncertain”.  

“They found insurance complex and difficult. Some discovered information they did not understand or did not know how to respond to. This often caused them to delay in engaging further with their fund on insurance after their initial interaction,” the ASIC analysis of the report said. 

“The research highlights some challenges for trustees, such as those associated with providing more tailored information for members. At the same time, there is an opportunity for trustees to significantly improve their members’ experience by improving communication to members about insurance, including on their websites,” ASIC said. 

It said many of the problems members experienced may have been reduced or avoided if the information they sought was easy to find, clear and balanced. 

“Superannuation trustees are encouraged to consider the issues raised in this report and how they might improve the experience of their members when they seek to engage about insurance,” the report said. 

The report, undertaken by Susanbell Research, found that “some members expressed a need for something beyond straight factual information but they did not use the term advice or consider that they needed a financial adviser”. 

“They called it an ‘independent take’, a ‘review’, or asked for ‘specific’ information that was relevant to their personal circumstances – for example how much cover to have at a certain life stage.” 

“In our view, these members had only a vague idea about how superannuation funds give information or provide advice and did not appear to understand the demarcation between the two. When they did not receive the guidance they expected, they were left disappointed and unsure what to do next.” 

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months ago

BlackRock Australia plans to launch a Bitcoin ETF later this month, wrapping the firm’s US-listed version which is US$85 billion in size....

5 days 3 hours ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo