AIST precipitates APRA’s separation of superannuation

AIST the Australian institute of superannuation trustees superannuation trustees APRA the Australian prudential regulation authority capability review Karen volpato productivity commission Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia

19 July 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) flagged that superannuation needed different treatment to other institutions by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in its submission to the Capability Review, precipitating the regulator’s move this week that it would develop a separate approach to super.

The AIST submitted to the Capability Review that APRA’s current mandate didn’t address the promise made by superannuation or recognise how it differed to that of other financial institutions. In fact, it argued that the mandate was written for banking and insurance.

“With banking, the ‘promise’ is clear – that the money in a depositors account will be there when they want it. With insurance, the ‘promise’ is clear – if an insurable event occurs, the insurance company will pay,” AIST senior policy adviser, Karen Volpato, wrote in the submission.

“With superannuation, there has been little discussion of what is the ‘promise’. Given the strong focus of both the Productivity Commission and the Financial Services Royal Commission on members’ best interests (and in the case of the FSRC community expectations), this must be addressed by the Capability Review.”

Further, the industry super fund body submitted that APRA’s key performance indicators should be changed in relation to superannuation, calling for the best interests of members to be included in a revised measure of APRA’s success.

In its current state, ‘loss’ as a performance indicator related to immediate failure or financial loss to regulated entities, which didn’t include loss to member value arising from entities not acting in members’ best interests.

In determining good value, the AIST recommended that APRA take on the role of ensuring that good value was delivered to members, rather than only considering financial loss, and implement a data framework to identify what data is needed to benchmark performance.

The Capability Review recommended this latter factor, in a move largely welcomed by industry super funds but warned against by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 3 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 4 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 3 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 3 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS