2-month delay recommended on insurance inside super

24 July 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

In a minor win for superannuation funds and group life insurers, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee has recommended to the Government that it defer the implementation of the its second round of legislation impacting insurance inside superannuation for two months.

The committee is also backing a Productivity Commission call for an independent public inquiry into insurance inside superannuation to determine whether other policy changes are needed.

The major recommendation flowing from the Senate Committee’s review of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Members’ Interests First) Bill was that the commencement date for the legislation be delayed until 1 December, this year. However, this is only three months longer than the original 1 October date which was widely regarded as inadequate.

The outcome will dismay many superannuation fund and insurance industry executives who were arguing for a longer delay because of continuing confusion around the implementation of the Government’s allied Protecting Your Super legislation.

In dissenting comments, Labor members of the Senate Committee expressed concerns about the implementation timetable, the committee’s failure to recommend the exclusion of superannuation fund members in high risk occupations and the impact on insurance premiums.

The Senate Committee report noted that the most frequently raised concern by inquiry participants and that the committee was being told that the 1 October date was unworkable or unachievable.

The Senate Committee also did not take account of industry submissions that workers aged under 25 and working in high risk occupations should be excluded from the legislation and gave no positive recognition to the impact the legislation would have on the premiums attaching to insurance inside superannuation.

On the question of workers in high risk occupations, the committee’s chairman, Liberal Senator, Slade Brockman said that the legislation did not bar superannuation fund members in high risk areas from opting in to insurance.

“Furthermore, the committee reiterates that there are other support mechanisms available to assist people affected by illness or injury and who are unable to work,” he said in the committee report.

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

6 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 6 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 10 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND