Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Will ASIC’s review tell the whole story on grandfathering?

ASIC/Josh-Frydenberg/grandfathering/federal-government/

15 October 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Grandfathering will come to an end in the Australian financial services industry before the Government actually gains a comprehensive and final picture of potential adverse client outcomes from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

What is more, ASIC’s final report to the Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, will not encompass data about the number of individual financial advisers who have been receiving grandfathered remuneration.

These facts have been laid bare in an ASIC answer to a question on notice from the Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services which makes it clear that while grandfathering will end on 1 January, 2021, ASIC will not be delivering its final report until six months’ later on 30 June, 2021.

ASIC said that in building that final report it would be “seeking to understand factors which impact the ending of arrangements, including potential adverse client outcomes” including those relating to exit fees, capital gains tax and Centrelink.

The ASIC answer said the regulator was obtaining data about the number product providers and products that pay grandfathered conflicted remuneration, the dealer groups and advice licensees who received conflicted remuneration and the “client accounts that grandfathered conflicted remuneration is paid in respect of”.

However, ASIC said it was not obtaining data about the number of individual financial advisers that dealer groups/advice licensees passed grandfathered conflicted remuneration on to.

“ASIC’s quantitative review includes life insurance and annuity product providers to the extent that they were identified as payers of grandfathered conflicted remuneration,” it said. “The ability of product providers to rebate or impediments to them doing so is an issue ASIC intends to explore with a sample of product providers in its qualitative review.”

The ASIC answer to the question on notice has come amidst expressions of concern from groups such as the Association of Financial Adviser (AFA) about the legislation having been imposed without the benefit of a regulatory impact statement.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND