PIS warns of unlevel playing field post-FOFA
The financial planning industry needs to be just as pragmatic about its underlying economics as it is about its pursuit of becoming a profession, according to the managing director of Professional Investment Services (PIS), Grahame Evans (pictured).
Evans said the economics of the industry had developed to create a situation in which those who had more subsidised those who had less.
“Whilst the idealism of a profession is certainly a very worthy goal, we must consider the impacts to the availability, cost and quality of advice,” he said.
“This is not a cliff face exercise, it is a journey and as such we need to transition the industry in a way that does not destroy but ensures a level playing field,” Evans said. “The last thing we would want is to go back to a quasi-tied agency structure.” However, he said that with consolidation occurring within the financial planning industry, there was a genuine possibility that the tied-agency structure would make a return.
Evans said PIS was extremely concerned about the boutique licensees that did not have the scale to vertically integrate.
“If I was a boutique I would be pressing the Government for some form of compensation in similar fashion to the dairy and fishing industries,” he said. “It is evident to most that the value of the boutique licensees’ business will fall as a result of these changes.”
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
