Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Fixed term investment marketers in ASIC’s sights

fixed-income/ASIC/Alternatives/APRA/

8 May 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The marketers of fixed-term investment products have found themselves in the sights of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with the regulator warning consumers that such offerings are not necessarily comparable with bank term deposits. 

ASIC said it was monitoring advertising around the products and flagged the likelihood of action against the promoters. 

It pointed to what it described as “a surge” in the marketing of fixed-term investment products in recent months. 

“ASIC is monitoring such advertising and the entities involved because of reports about fixed-income products being advertised as term deposit ‘alternatives’ or ‘substitutes’, and consumers investing significant sums as a result,” the regulator said. 

“ASIC views these investment products as riskier than term deposits because they may be issued by entities that are not well-capitalised, not protected by the Government’s Financial Claims Scheme, and not supervised by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). Some are also backed by concentrated portfolios of higher risk unlisted and illiquid assets,” it said. 

“ASIC recognises that many consumers may be seeking higher and regular returns on their investments during this time because of low interest rates and market volatility. But there are significant differences between bank term deposits that are relatively low-risk products and fixed-term funds and debentures offering regular, fixed distributions that are higher risk investment products.” 

ASIC noted that bank term deposits were considered relatively low-risk because they  were protected by the Government’s Financial Claims Scheme, also known as the Government guarantee, which guarantees the first $250,000 invested (per depositor, per bank) and the ability of banks to honour their commitments to depositors was actively supervised and monitored by APRA. 

Commenting on the regulator’s approach, ASIC deputy chair Karen Chester said, “If an investment product offers higher returns than a term deposit, it is more likely than not to be higher risk. In the current uncertain and volatile markets, higher risk investment products are, more than ever, not for everyone. Especially for smaller investors, be they retail or wholesale, when they are not investing as part of a diversified portfolio”. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND