ATO warning on agricultural MISs

federal-court/ATO/australian-taxation-office/

7 February 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has used a Federal Court decision this week to send a strong message on the need for agricultural Managed Investment Schemes (MISs) to deliver on the schemes in the way that has been promised. 

The ATO referenced the fact that Federal Court had fined Barossa Vines Limited and its directors more than $1 million for breaching the promoter penalty provisions of the Taxation Administration Act. 

It pointed out that the court had awarded civil penalties to the ATO against a company and four people running a MIS because they failed to carry out their wine grape growing activities in accordance with the agreed terms of their product ruling. 

Commenting on the outcome, ATO deputy commissioner Tim Dyce said the judgment sent a strong message that the courts would penalise scheme promoters who do not implement schemes in the way they promised. 

“We issue product rulings to give investors certainty about the tax consequences of their investment. However, the scheme must be implemented as it was described,” Dyce said. “As we discovered, this was not the case and the promoters’ actions had unfortunate consequences for investors, whose deductions were disallowed.” 

He said the ATO always preferred to adopt a consultative approach by working with scheme designers and product issuers so they were aware of their responsibilities under a product ruling. 

“We thank those community members who came forward with information which led to this court outcome, as this helps us protect investors from scheme promoters who breach the promoter penalty provisions,” Dyce said. 

The ATO cited the words of the Federal Court judge, Justice Besanko, who, delivering his judgement, said:  “These are significant contraventions ¨ The failure to heed the warnings of the viticultural experts and others and to check on the progress on the [grape vine] rootlings mean, to my mind, that the respondents were prepared to put their own commercial interests ahead of their important obligations to investors.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

3 weeks 2 days ago

A former financial adviser who stole $4.4 million from his family and friends to feed gambling debts has been permanently banned by ASIC....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo