ASIC canvasses more power on retail hybrids
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has admitted it has not raised concerns with either the Government or the Treasury about retail sales of hybrid securities but would nonetheless like more powers to deal with the products.
Answering questions on notice from the Senate Standing Committee on Economics prompted by significant concerns about retail sales of hybrids expressed by former ASIC chairman, Greg Medcraft, the regulator confirmed it had neither raised specific concerns about the products nor recommended a ban on their sale to retail investors or self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).
“However, ASIC has considered whether its current tools are sufficient to address the risks posed to retail investors by complex products (which include hybrid securities), and what other approaches could be adopted to improve investor outcomes,” the ASIC response said.
The regulator said it had examined its approach to complex products through a dedicated Complex Products Working Group which had published a report in early 2014 and had also examined its regulatory toolkit and considered whether it was sufficient to address the risks posed to retail investors by complex products.
“ASIC has identified further powers that would help it ensure investors are confident and informed, and advocated for these in its submissions to the Financial System Inquiry, and the Government's response to the FSI seeking feedback on the introduction of Design and Distribution Obligations and a Product Intervention Power,” the ASIC answer said.
“If the proposed Product Intervention Power becomes law, it would enable ASIC to take direct action to deal with significant shortcomings in products or conduct that result in consumer detriment, although no decision has been made by ASIC that such a power would be used to restrict the sale of hybrid securities to retail investors or SMSFs,” it said.
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
