APRA announces key mortgage changes
Australia's major home lenders have today faced a rule change which will require them to increase the amount of capital they are required to hold to back mortgages.
The rule change has been announced by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced today that for Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs) such as banks and building societies, the average risk weight on Australian residential mortgage exposures would increase from approximately 16 per cent to at least 25 per cent.
The APRA announcement said the increase in the internal ratings-based (IRB) mortgage risk weights addressed a recommendation of the Financial System Inquiry (FSI).
However, it said increase was also consistent with the direction of work being undertaken by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) on changes to the global capital adequacy framework for banks.
The APRA announcement said the increased IRB risk weights would apply to all Australian residential mortgages, other than lending to small businesses secured by residential mortgage.
However, in making the announcement, APRA flagged a 12 month transition saying the new arrangements would take effect from 1 July, next year.
In order to provide these ADIs sufficient time to prepare for the change, the higher risk weights will come into effect from 1 July 2016.
Further it said the increase in IRB mortgage risk weights announced today was an interim measure because it was not possible to settle on the final calibration between the IRB and standardised mortgage risk weights until changes arising from the Basel Committee's broader review of the framework were complete.
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
