Tax incentives would help life/risk

28 March 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Australians are still strongly price-sensitive to life insurance and might be motivated to change their attitude if it received the same tax treatment as health insurance, according to new data released by major insurer MetLife and the Financial Services Council (FSC).

The research directly pointed to the manner in which tax incentives such as those provided with respect to health insurance could act to overcome the inertia in evidence among Australians with respect to obtaining and maintaining life insurance.

The research, titled Apathy to Action, was launched ahead of the FSC Life Insurance Conference, with the key finding that the Australian insurance industry needs to find ways of motivating people to obtain cover.

This was in circumstances where the survey pointed out that the top three reasons why consumers say they don't buy life insurance and income protection are related to price-sensivity:

1. Too expensive;

2. Waste of money/poor value; and

3. No spare money.

The research then contrasted this with the top three things that would most motivate consumers to purchase life insurance:

1. A tax incentive from the Government;

2. Purchasing through superannuation without a drop in income; and

3. Taking out a minimum level of insurance to avoid extra tax.

Commenting on the research findings, FSC chief executive John Brogden said it showed Australian consumers were willing to insure their visible assets such as their house or car, but most did not consider protecting their lives and their health as a priority.

"The research is clear − Australians don't understand the benefits of taking out life insurance," he said.

"As an industry, we need to change the way we talk to Australians about life insurance if we are to close the $1.1 trillion death and disability under-insurance gap," Brogden said.

MetLife chief executive Damien Green said the research showed that most consumers didn't understand life insurance terms such as total permanent disability and income protection, with most consumers only thinking of life insurance as ‘death cover' rather than the range of protection solutions available.

"The industry needs to work together to develop life insurance products that consumers want and will benefit from," Green said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND