Legacy products biggest barrier to life innovation

22 April 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

Senator Jane Hume has cited legacy products as one of the biggest barriers of innovation in the life insurance industry, while the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) says the industry needs bear the burden of re-investment.

Speaking at the Financial Services Council (FSC), Hume said legacy insurance imposed the most significant cost on the industry.

“The FSC has conservatively estimated there are conservatively around 286 outdated life products and $22.6 billion of funds under management are allocated to aged products – now that’s a huge inefficiency,” she said.

“Even a small number of outdated products on insurance products can lead to incredible diseconomies of scale.

“Each closed, financial product requires a broad range of services to manage it and maintain it – my understanding is that these maintenance requirements for all products are not much lower than for those for current on-sale products.

“They require the maintenance of old technology and specialist accounting, audit disclosure and administrative services.”

Hume said running outdated systems led to higher costs, greater operational risks, and higher chances of fraud.

“It makes businesses pile money into managing and maintaining filing cabinets, rather than investing in product development or innovative claims management technology,” Hume said.

“When insurers spend too much time looking after aged products, they spend too little time thinking about how to best serve their customers.”

Helen Rowell, APRA deputy chair, said the industry had to be prepared to make the investments needed to get the simplification of things like legacy products.

“There’s a cost of doing that and the players in the industry need to accept they have to bear some of that cost,” Rowell said.

“Yes, there may be things the Government needs to do through regulation as well but it’s this idea of shared solutions and shared approaches rather than this is a problem that someone else needs to fix.

“And you’d get a better hearing from the Government if there was a sense there was a shared purpose and willingness to mutually work on problems.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 17 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 18 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND