Calls for insurers to only pay medical bills a ‘Trojan horse’

life insurance insurance illness claims

10 August 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council’s (FSC’s) campaign to change the law to allow insurers to only pay medical bills of sick workers instead of the entire insurance claim is a “Trojan horse to push past privacy and other legal rights”, Maurice Blackburn Lawyers believe.

The law firm’s principal, Josh Mennen, said renewed calls for greater involvement in worker rehabilitation was part of a push to expand insurer’s powers so fewer claims would need to be paid out.

“The FSC has itself acknowledged that the opportunities for disability insurance claimants to return to work are extremely limited under normal circumstances, let alone under the current economic crisis engulfing Australia,” he said.

“It’s therefore irresponsible to suggest that an insurer should be calling the shots on claimants medical treatment plans in an attempt to get them back into a severely diminished job market.

“What insurers should be instead focusing on is the ongoing and timely payment of legitimate claims so that disabled consumers can afford the medical and other support they need – and without the inappropriate interference of an insurer in those therapeutic relationship.” 

Mennan noted the proposal had been previously rejected by a Parliamentary Joint Committee in 2018 which recommended the Australian Securities and Investments Committee to conduct an investigation into the use of in-house rehabilitation services by insurers.

“The Parliamentary Joint Committee made a series of sensible findings and recommendations which would ensure that consumers were protected from potential insurer overreach,” he said.

“While it appears to be altruistic, the FSC’s campaign to change the law has always been a Trojan horse to push past the privacy and other legal rights of their disabled claimants and gain greater control over their medical treatment.

“Until the Committee’s recommendations have been faithfully completed and the findings of the ASIC investigation are released, then any calls for an expansion of a life insurer’s rights in the medical decisions of claimants is premature and unwarranted.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

James Patterson

How much did IRESS pay Deloitte for this analysis? Not sure they are the arbiter of intelligent forecasting in this spac...

21 hours ago
Howard Elton

Article makes no comment that the advisers leaving industry are older and have many years of work an life experience w...

2 days 4 hours ago
Peter Robinson

This article appears to overlook the fact that there must be a fairly large group of advisers who missed out on the expe...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has secured travel restraint orders against a financial adviser while he is the subject of an investigation into alleged financial misconduct....

4 days 22 hours ago

Insignia Financial has unveiled a new operating model and executive team, including a new head of advice, while three senior executives are set to depart the licensee....

2 weeks 2 days ago

Analysis by Chant West of the annual performance of growth superannuation funds has uncovered which ones see the best performance....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Ardea Diversified Bond F
144.00 3 y p.a(%)
3
Hills International
63.39 3 y p.a(%)