ASIC convinces parliamentarians on life/risk advice

ASIC/APRA/regulation/

13 December 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

A key Parliamentary committee appears to have accepted the explanations of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with respect to the number of potentially non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry.

The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics dedicated a section of its report emanating out of its Review of the ASIC Annual Report, to the regulator’s assessment of life/risk advice and, in particular, confusion around how many advisers might have been guilty of churn.

In doing so, the committee chairman, David Coleman said it had “noted current public confusion regarding statements made by ASIC in relation to the number of potentially non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry”.

“The committee asked ASIC for clarification of whether it believes 50 financial advisers were at greater risk of having high lapse rates, or whether 50 per cent of advisors were potentially non-compliant,” Coleman said in his report.

He said that ASIC had noted that it was currently collecting data about advisors with high life insurance lapse rates and explained: “As part of the initial data that came through, we identified around 500 advisers with potential issues around higher levels of lapse rates. Of course, there may be quite legitimate reasons why people are being switched or moved between products. We can't go in and undertake high-intensity surveillance of every single one of those. We've narrowed it down to a much smaller pool in the first instance to go and look at and do more in-depth surveillance”

Coleman’s report said that while ASIC remarked that some media articles suggested only those people were possibly causing problems, it added that ‘we are still, unfortunately seeing some problematic advice around life insurance in the surveillances that we undertake’.

“ASIC added that the potential number of non-compliant financial advisers in the life insurance industry is ‘not limited just to that smaller target group that has come up through our first data-gathering exercise.’”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 20 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo