Transparency of smart beta ETFs a concern
Smart beta exchange traded funds (ETF) still lack appropriate levels of transparency with a strong majority of professional users of the funds expressing concerns over the difficulty of assessing risks within the funds.
However, this concern has not dampened appetite for smart beta ETFs with use expected to increase according to a survey of public and private European asset managers conducted by European fund manager Amundi and EDHEC-Risk Institute.
The survey covered 222 investment decision makers at the chief executive, chief investment officer, asset allocation and portfolio management levels in institutional and private wealth managers in 27 European countries.
According to a report on the survey, which was released yesterday, 88 per cent of respondents stated that smart beta indices required full transparency on methodology and risk analytics.
The report stated transparency offered protection against conflicts of interests and would improve the ‘informational efficiency' of the indexing industry but was lagging within the smart beta ETF sector.
"While transparency is important for market indices, it is all the more so for smart beta indices. Unfortunately, these indices' low level of transparency, which is routinely justified by the use of proprietary models, makes the evaluation of risks difficult," the report stated.
However, it seems this has not put off investment managers with the report also stating that of those who use smart beta strategies 49 per cent use ETFs or ETF-like products to invest in smart beta. At the same time smart beta ETFs or ETF like products represented a third of the total amount invested in smart beta by survey respondents.
Recommended for you
GQG Partners has reported a decline in funds under management in April, but YTD inflows are approaching $10 billion.
Confusion around what classes as “sustainable” can lead to large fund performance differentials, making fund selection a material risk for advisers, according to Scientific Beta.
After five consecutive months of positive flows at Magellan, April saw $0.2 billion in institutional inflows offset by the same volume of retail outflows.
Alphinity Investment Management and CSIRO have brought its responsible AI framework to the market, helping investors navigate AI alongside ESG principles.
