Too many managers spoil the returns: van Eyk
Too many active managers can dilute the benefits of risk through over-diversification, according to van Eyk chief executive Mark Thomas.
Thomas said van Eyk research showed active managers bet mostly on movements in the market, and although investors paid higher fees for managed funds, portfolios often held little stock-specific or active risk.
Combining active managers in a portfolio can water down that small amount of risk even further, according to van Eyk.
From three randomly selected active fund managers in a single portfolio, only two stockholdings varied more than 2 per cent from the benchmark while the rest were less than 2 per cent of their market weight, according to the research.
"You need to dig down deep into the detail when mixing these sorts of investments in order to get the degree of risk you intended," Thomas said.
Thomas said it was the right time for investors to be taking on more risk due to relatively attractive share valuations, and ongoing market volatility driven by the euro crisis and other economic strains that give active managers the opportunity to exploit market mispricing.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
Almost 70 per cent of asset managers are planning to control costs via product rationalisation, according to a global survey by Northern Trust, as they seek to offer clients a best-in-class experience.
Fund managers should work collaboratively with data providers to minimise greenwashing risks in their products as a positive ESG score can be a “gamechanger” for a fund’s demand with advisers.
Asset manager Janus Henderson has made two acquisitions in the ETFs and emerging markets space as it takes strategic steps to meet client needs.
Self-reporting issues to ASIC could lead to a reduced charge for a fund manager but it may not exempt them from enforcement action altogether, according to ASIC chair Joe Longo.
