Super weighs heavily on property returns
The weight of superannuation monies will continue to keep property yields low, according to Property Investment Research (PIR) director Mark Wist.
“The real issue in property is the weight of money generated by super and its allocation to property,” he said.
“Most large super funds allocate between 3 to 8 per cent to property, which is on top of the allocation to listed and unlisted REITs [real estate investment trusts].”
Property yields in Australia have been hovering around the 6 per cent mark, but there are deals in the pipeline that will push this down to 4 per cent.
Wist questioned how fund managers would achieve returns with these types of yields, which are less than the financing rates.
“The chase for assets has driven yields down to the point where the cost of debt is greater than the yield,” he said.
“In order to negate that, some managers are returning capital to investors to boost yields.
“We take a dim view of such actions.”
The lack of quality property assets in Australia is forcing managers to look in Europe and Japan for property. Wist said the cost of borrowing in these countries is making the yields look attractive, although in the UK the average yield is about 4 per cent.
“However, in some European countries yields of 6 per cent are the average, which is why funds are chasing property over there,” he said.
But there is the issue of currency hedging, and Wist said some managers have turned more into financiers than property managers.
“There was a fund recently that announced a headline distribution of $186 million, but $140 million of that was currency gains,’ he said.
“It is not unusual with some funds to see 30 per cent of the yield achieved by currency hedging.”
Wist said PIR’s rating process is aware of such transactions and it is reflected in the final rating.
“I would like to see yield based on cash earnings from the property rather than gains from derivatives,” he said.
“Hopefully, there will be a time in the future where managers achieve underlying property growth to deliver results.”
Another problem with relying on currency transaction for yields is the risk premium that has to be factored into the trust.
Recommended for you
With active ETFs becoming the latest choice as fund managers target the retail audience, their high fees may be a detractor as research finds investors are shunning those priced any higher than 50 bps.
The possibility of a dissenting vote from shareholder L1 Capital has led Platinum Asset Management to scrap its conversion plan for the $450 million Platinum Capital LIC into an ETF.
Family office Lederer Group has made an off-market takeover bid for ASX-listed Elanor Commercial Property Fund, with chair Paul Lederer taking exception at the firm’s lack of accountability, oversight and transparency.
Janus Henderson is actively seeking to partner with private wealth firms in Australia as it looks to expand its number of strategic partnerships, as well as focus on retirement income product development.
