Majority of hedge funds not delivering on their promise
Only 30 per cent of institutional investors' hedge fund portfolios outperform simple investible benchmarks as fees make hedge fund portfolios ‘bad investments' with net alpha of -1.88 per cent, according to CEM Benchmarking.
Its recent study analysed realised hedge funds portfolio returns of over 300 large global investors and found that for most funds, with return histories exceeding five years, the performance could be replicated at much lower cost by simple equity/debt blends.
The study also proved that many funds were promised superior uncorrelated returns, but they received neither .The average correlation to simple stock/bond portfolios was 84 per cent, and for over half of funds correlations exceeded 90 per cent.
Senior research analyst and lead author of the study, Alexander Beath, said that most hedge fund portfolios looked "surprisingly like simple stock/bond portfolios".
"I think the most surprising part of the study is just how much of the return of hedge funds can be replicated by simple holding a 50/50 stock/bond portfolio. Hedge funds are often compared to equity indices, but this isn't appropriate. The risk and correlations in hedge funds lies somewhere between stock and bonds, and so this is what they should be compared to"
Additionally, the study also analysed each hedge fund portfolio separately, finding the optimal risk-matched investable portfolio for each with the on average split to be 44 per cent equity and 56 per cent fixed income with a duration of over five years, which was not far from vanilla 50/50 portfolios.
The percentage of hedge fund portfolios that managed to outperform the investable index included the following features:
- Funds with long histories investing in hedge funds tended to outperform those with short histories;
- Funds with lower correlation to equity/debt blends tended to outperform those with high correlations; and
- Funds with low cost implementation tended to outperform those with high cost implementation .
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.
Flows into Australasian sustainable funds have moved back into outflow territory in the second quarter of 2025 driven by US$400 million in redemptions from passive funds.
