Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

La Trobe fined for misleading investors in $5b fund

La-Trobe/ASIC/penalty/fine/advertising/

29 November 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

La Trobe Financial Asset Management has been fined $750,000 for false and misleading marketing of its Australian Credit fund.

The Federal Court ruled La Trobe’s advertising in newspaper, magazines and websites included statements that any capital invested would be ‘stable’.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said “this gave the impression there could be no loss of capital and that La Trobe failed to express in a sufficiently prominent manner that a person who invested in the fund could, in fact, lose substantial amounts of capital invested”.

The La Trobe Australian Credit fund was over $5.15 billion in assets under management.

This was one of two failures by La Trobe as the court also found it made false or misleading representations that investors in its 48 hour account and 90 day account would be able to withdraw their funds between 48 hours and 90 days of providing withdrawal notice whereas:

  • La Trobe had up to 12 months to satisfy a withdrawal while the fund was liquid;
  • If the fund ceased to be liquid, investors were entitled to withdraw only when a withdrawal offer was made by La Trobe.

In his decision, Justice O’Bryan stated: “The misleading conduct was serious and had very considerable potential to mislead the public about the characteristics of the investment options – both as to the entitlement to withdraw funds and the risk of loss of capital invested.

“Each of the representations was made over periods ranging from about one year to more than three years, in a variety of different media that were all accessible by the general public. Further, the misleading conduct potentially affected investment decisions involving very large sums of money.”

ASIC deputy chair, Karen Chester, said, “When consumers are considering investments, they need to be provided with accurate information that doesn’t mislead them. ASIC was concerned that these investment products were being sold as stable and more liquid when they were not, and essential detail was being left in the fine print”.

La Trobe, as the responsible entity of the Fund, was ordered to pay ASIC’s costs. The Court acknowledged La Trobe’s consent to the declarations of liability and pecuniary penalty.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

6 days 18 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND