Investment strategies mismatched with fund managers’ philosophies



Portfolio strategies used by equity fund managers in Australia do not always match their stated investment philosophies, new research by the Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR) reveals.
CIFR chief executive, David Gallagher, said data covering 37 active funds over a 15-year period, showed that while mismatches were not necessarily intentional, underestimations in asset turnover and tracking errors could lead investors to expect lower transaction costs and a higher information ration than what was actually delivered.
The study, which compared information sourced from investment management questionnaires against the managers' own performance found that compliance with their self-declared number of stock holdings improved over time, but managers systematically underestimated maximum portfolio turnover rates and tracking errors.
"Overall, our research suggests that those who use the questionnaire responses should view self-declared limits on the number of stocks held, tracking error and asset turnover as relative rather than absolute indicators of a manager's investment process," he said.
Recommended for you
Infrastructure assets are well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty and can enhance the diversification of traditional portfolios with their evergreen characteristics, an investment chief believes.
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.