Fund managers blur lines on SRI

fund-managers/industry-funds/lonsec/BT/global-financial-crisis/

24 September 2010
| By Mike Taylor |

The lines are being blurred between conventional Australian equities funds and those built around socially responsible investing (SRI) as fund managers pursue mandates, according to the latest analysis released by ratings house Lonsec.

The latest Lonsec sector review covering Australian and global equity SRI funds not only points to a blurring of the lines, but questions the motivations of some fund managers signing up to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI).

“There is some scepticism concerning fund managers’ motivations for signing the UNPRI, that perhaps managers are adopting a me-too, tick-the-box mentality to appease key clients as opposed to genuine belief in the investment merits of the discipline,” the analysis said.

However, it said Lonsec believed such approaches were “largely at the margins of the industry” and that discussions with those managers on the Lonsec coverage list gave confidence that the majority of managers were enthusiastic proponents of the responsible investment industry.

Discussing the blurring of the lines between SRI and conventional equity funds, Lonsec said the increased integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) into mainstream company research processes had been influenced, in part, by the institutional sector, particularly industry funds.

It said that this had followed industry funds and European pension industry funds requiring evidence of an ESG component as integral to the manager selection process.

The Lonsec sector review noted that the ESG sector had taken a hit in the fallout from the global financial crisis and that there had been an absence of new product development since the credit crunch.

It said this was consistent with product development across most equities categories and noted, “generally, the sector is yet to experience the resurgence in interest encouraging investment managers to freshen product lines”.

The Lonsec review revealed just two funds — the BT Wholesale — Ethical Share Fund and the ING Wholesale — Sustainable Investment Australian Shares Trust — as being worthy of its ‘highly recommended’ rating, while the Australian Ethical Larger Companies Share Trust was rated ‘investment grade’ and the Challenger Wholesale Socially Responsible Share Fund (now known as Alphinity Socially Responsible Share Fund) had been placed on ‘fund watch’. All other funds in the Lonsec review gained a ‘recommended’ rating.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 12 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo