Is China an emerging market?



The inclusion of China A-Shares in several indexes illustrates the problem with classifying China’s mainland securities as developed, emerging or frontier, according to Parametric.
This was evidenced by three criterion applied by MSCI when considering how to classify a country which included the following metrics: economic development, size and liquidity, and market accessibility.
Parametric’s head of investment strategy, Tim Atwill, noted that when measuring the average citizen's income level, China was quite close to meeting the World Bank's definition of high income.
“As stated, this criteria supports MSCI's current classification of China as emerging. Note that this is the closest equivalent to what's commonly meant when investors say China is practically a developed economy - it's become a relatively rich country in the global context,” he said.
At the same time, the second criterion (size and liquidity) would argue for China to be considered a developed market as the mainland exchanges had dozens of large, liquid stocks that meet the market-cap and float requirements.
Following this, the third criterion (market accessibility), however, was the most qualitative, addressing what it meant for a market to have developed-like structures and practices.
“All of this speaks to the historically unique problem MSCI (and global investors) find themselves grappling with - China is a nation that's on the brink of being economically developed but still retains market practices more commonly associated with a frontier-market country,” Atwill said.
According to Atwill, this conundrum led to MSCI's delay in its initial inclusion of A-shares, and even now MSCI is choosing to include only a small fraction of their representative weight while it encourages Chinese authorities to make needed market reforms, he said.
Recommended for you
Infrastructure assets are well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty and can enhance the diversification of traditional portfolios with their evergreen characteristics, an investment chief believes.
Volatility in US markets means currency is becoming a critical decision factor in Australian investors’ ETF selection this year.
Clime Investment Management is overhauling the selection process for its APLs, with managing director Michael Baragwanath describing the threat of a product failure affecting clients as “pure nightmare fuel”.
Global X will expand its ETF range of exchange-traded funds next month with a low-cost Australian equity product as it chases ambitions of becoming a top issuer of ETFs in Australia.