Avoid arbitrary investment decisions: Vanguard

24 October 2017
| By Hope William-Smith |
image
image
expand image

Investors need to avoid arbitrary action when deciding how to allocate their portfolios across actively managed and index investments and follow clear process strategies, according to Vanguard.

Vanguard’s new white paper ‘Making the implicit explicit: A framework for the active-passive decision,’ has outlined a decision-making framework of four variables for strategising around asset allocation across active and index strategies.

Vanguard Australia head of investment strategy, Aidan Geysen said the framework had been developed by the group’s Investment Strategy Group and considered the following four variables for decision-making:

  • Gross alpha expectation: the expected outperformance of a given active strategy
  • Cost of active management: management expenses, transaction fees and other costs associated
  • Active risk: the potential for underperformance by a given active strategy
  • Risk tolerance: an investor's tolerance for an active manager's potential underperformance

Geysen said the report highlighted the importance of establishing an appropriate strategic asset allocation from the onset of the construction process and taking into account the unique needs of a portfolio.

“Discussions about active and index investing can draw some strong views from investors and their professional advisers, one way or the other,” Geysen said.

 “We see active-passive not as a debate, but as an asset allocation decision, and this framework gives investors a clear process to help them determine the active and index allocations within their portfolio.”

Investors’ preference for risk, their return requirements, goals and investment horizon were also measured within the research, which Geysen said had been designed to assist investors to think more carefully around expectations and risk.

The report also said the four variables could also assist investors to decide whether to implement index or active, or a combination of both in discussion with an adviser.

“Choosing between active and index isn't a philosophical decision – it's part of the asset allocation process. The ideal choice is the one that best aligns with an investor,” Geysen said.

“Whether or not a higher allocation to active is appropriate can differ greatly.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

18 hours 34 minutes ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

19 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

19 hours 43 minutes ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND