Why terminating an AR may be good business
Termination for a poor regulatory compliance history may be a reality for those undertaking the acquisition of a financial advice firm, according to specialist legal firm the The Fold.
One of the firm’s director, Simon Carrodus has used a blog to point out that retaining authorised representatives is not straightforward and that their individual compliance history should be reviewed.
“You may need to terminate a representative if they have a poor compliance history or require the seller to do so as a condition precedent,” he wrote.
Carrodus said that exposure to non-compliance could be fatal for purchasers but many buyers simply did not include a compliance audit in their due diligence.
He said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) “is on the warpath and you can be liable even if you weren’t operating the business at the time of non-compliance”.
“So before you purchase a business that holds an Australian Financial Services Licence or Australian Credit Licence you need to make sure the compliance records and policies are up to standard,” Carrodus said.
“If you purchase a business with a history of non-compliance, ASIC may hold you accountable for regulatory non-compliance. This is possible even if the acts or omissions that led to non-compliance took place under the previous owner.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Private market secondaries manager Coller Capital has unveiled a new education platform to improve advisers’ and investors’ understanding of secondaries.
In the run-up to heavy losses expected at the end of the financial year, June has already reported consecutive weeks of adviser losses.
ASIC has banned a former NSW adviser from providing advice for 10 years for investing at least $14.8 million into a cryptocurrency-based scam.
