Westpac slammed with $3.3m fine for BBSW manipulation
The Federal Court has ordered Westpac to pay a $3.3 million penalty for its involvement in setting the BBSW in 2010.
The order follows Justice Beach’s judgment in May that found the bank had traded on four occasions in 2010 with a dominant purpose of influencing yields of traded Prime Bank Bills and where the BBSW was set in a way that was favourable to its rate set exposure.
In his judgment, Justice Beach said the bank’s misconduct was serious and unacceptable, and that Westpac had not shown the contrition of other banks.
“Moreover, imposing the maximum penalty is the only step available to me to achieve specific and general deterrence,” said Beach. “The message that should be sent is that if you manipulate or attempt to manipulate key benchmark rates you are likely to have the maximum penalty imposed, whatever that is from time to time.”
The Court also ordered that an independent expert be appointed to review whether Westpac’s current systems, policies and procedures are appropriate, and to report back to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission within nine months.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
With many advisers preparing to retire or sell up, business advisory firm Business Health believes advisers need to take a proactive approach to informing their clients of succession plans.
Retirement commentators have flagged that almost a third of Australians over 50 are unprepared for the longevity of retirement and are falling behind APAC peers in their preparations and advice engagement.
As private markets continue to garner investor interest, Netwealth’s series of private market reports have revealed how much advisers and wealth managers are allocating, as well as a growing attraction to evergreen funds.
