Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Sydney adviser permanently banned by ASIC

ASIC/banning/Sydney/financial-advice/

13 March 2025
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, having had his firm’s Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) cancelled a year ago.

Peter Surtenich was banned by ASIC on 6 March from providing any financial services, performing any function involved in the carrying on of a financial services business and controlling, whether alone or in concert with one or more other entities, an entity that carries on a financial services business.

ASIC said he “acted dishonestly and showed a fundamental lack of knowledge and judgement, integrity, trustworthiness and professionalism”. 

Surtenich was a director and responsible manager at Suetonius Wealth Management which had its AFSL cancelled last March for failing to lodge financial statements and audit reports. The regulator said it had provided Suetonius with the opportunity to lodge its financial statements and audit reports for the financial years ended 30 June 2021 and 30 June 2022, but that it had failed to do so as of 29 February 2024.

ASIC alleged Surtenich recommended to at least 18 clients that they invest in a “Principal-protected Private Placement Program” which offered “high yield” returns. ASIC determined that in recommending these investments, he failed to comply with the financial services law by making dishonest representations that the investment was “capital protected”, was “similar to” a cash investment, and could generate high returns. 

Surtenich had no basis for making the representations, ASIC said. 

Additionally, ASIC determined that Surtenich lacked the necessary judgement and competence to be a financial adviser. ASIC found that in arranging transfer of client funds to another Australian entity to obtain a so-called “stand-by letter of credit”, Surtenich ought to have been alerted to potential “red flags” as to the authenticity of the transaction, including in relation to the payment of subsequent fees to a bitcoin wallet of an alleged banking institution.

He has the right to appeal to the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of ASIC’s decision.
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 weeks ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

7 months ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

3 weeks 2 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND