Super funds accept planning as integral offering

superannuation-industry/cent/remuneration/financial-planning/financial-planners/money-management/superannuation-funds/super-funds/

8 June 2006
| By Carmen Watts |

The superannuation industry is embracing financial planning as an integral offering for members, but has strongly rejected a commission-based fee model.

A survey conducted by Money Managements sister publication Super Review has revealed that while the superannuation industry now broadly accepts that financial planning must be an integral service offering, it remains sceptical about the actual quality of financial planners.

The IUS/Super Review Super Outlook survey, conducted through April and early May, confirmed that the superannuation industry remains strongly opposed to commission-based financial planning arrangements, with more than 92.5 per cent of respondents indicating their preference for salaried and fee-for-service models where planner remuneration was concerned.

In fact, the survey revealed that 72.1 per cent of respondents wanted a fee-for-service model, while 20.4 per cent favoured a salary model. Only 7.5 per cent indicated they favoured a commission-based model.

The survey also revealed a belief that the implementation of choice of superannuation funds had made financial planning an integral part of the superannuation industry, with 83.4 per cent of respondents citing choice as a primary driver for the acceptance of planning within the industry.

Interestingly, 89.8 per cent of respondents said financial planning should now be provided as a service to members.

However, when it comes to passing a judgement on the abilities of financial planners, the superannuation industry remains somewhat jaundiced in its view, with more than 30 per cent of respondents believing the knowledge levels of financial planners were only either ‘adequate’ or ‘poor’.

Asked how they viewed the knowledge of financial planners as it applies to superannuation, 13.1 per cent of respondents suggested it was ‘excellent’, and that planners seemed generally well informed, 53.8 per cent said it was ‘good’, and that planners seemed to know enough to deal with most enquiries, while 24.8 per cent said it was ‘adequate’, with planners seeming to get by.

By comparison, 8.3 per cent of respondents rated the knowledge of planners as being ‘poor’ because they did not possess enough knowledge to help people make informed decisions.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 6 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

6 days 15 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo