S&P provides more clarity for ‘on hold’ funds
Standard and Poor’s (S&P) has introduced new measures to improve the transparency around fund ratings placed ‘on hold’.
According to head of fund ratings Mark Hoven, a new listing on the research subscription service available to financial planners will “provide further clarity around how S&P is working with fund managers to resolve ratings on funds”.
He added: “We recognise that ‘on hold’ ratings can have a significant effect on fund managers and financial planners alike, and we always attempt to resolve ‘on hold’ ratings as expeditiously as possible.”
According to Hoven, the steps fund managers need to take to resolve their ‘on hold’ ratings can take weeks or months, especially in instances where high profile departures from the organisation have resulted in an ‘on hold’ rating.
“In extended ‘on hold’ situations, S&P may have several meetings with the fund manager until we can establish a level of conviction around the appropriate rating outcome,” Hoven said.
He added: “This is the kind of information that planners appreciate so they can continue to inform their clients and determine the most appropriate course of action.”
High profile departures from three property managers in recent months have prompted ‘on hold’ actions, with one manager still retaining the ‘on hold’ rating while it forms a new investment team and formalises its process.
Recommended for you
ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland has detailed the regulator’s intentions to conduct surveillance on licensees and advisers who are recommending managed accounts, noting a review is “warranted and timely” given the sector’s growth.
AMP and HUB24 have shared the areas where they are seeking future adviser growth, with HUB24 targeting adding more than 2,000 advisers to the platform.
Bravura Solutions has appointed a new chair and deputy chair to take over from departing Matthew Quinn, while Shezad Okhai picks up another responsibility.
Two advisers say M&A is becoming a “contact sport” as competition heats up to acquire attractive advice firms, while a lack of new entrants creates roadblocks in organic growth opportunities.
