Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Ratings have limitations

financial-advisers/adviser/

13 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Financial advisers need to be aware of the limitations of the ratings provided by ratings houses, according to specialist financial services lawyer Peter Townsend.

Townsend, the principal of Townsends Business and Corporate Lawyers, said that if ratings were discussed it was vital the adviser made the client fully aware of what the ratings actually meant and how they could be used in assessing a product.

Advisers who want to use ratings to sell product must explain to the client the limitations of those ratings, Townsend warned.

"To do otherwise is to run a material risk of failing to fully meet the adviser's duty to the client," he said.

He referenced court findings with respect to action by Wingecarribee Shire Council against Lehman Brothers Australia and the use of product ratings.

Wingecarribee Shire Council lost a substantial amount of money by investing in so-called Synthetic Collateralised Debt Obligations (SCDOs), and it and many other councils took a class action against their adviser, Grange Securities, which had been taken over by Lehman Brothers Australia.

Lehman argued that the major ratings agencies (Standard & Poors, Fitch, and Moody's) had given the SCDOs high ratings and should have be proportionately liable for the councils' losses.

The argument ran that the ratings were effectively a representation that the SCDOs were equivalent, as regards risk profile, to other types of financial products carrying the same rating from the same ratings agency.

"The court would have none of it," Townsend said. "It held that the ratings did not convey that message. Rather it was how the adviser used the ratings that was the real concern.

"In this case Grange used the ratings to suggest that the products with similar ratings had similar risk profiles," Townsend said.

"Grange did not put the ratings, and the use to which they could be put, into context or explain to the client the limitations of the ratings in respect of identifying material risks of the product or its risk profile."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

4 days 6 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 1 day ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND