Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

PC calls for higher SMSF advice standards

SMSF/self-managed-super-funds/super-funds/superannuation-funds/training/financial-advisers/advisers/smsf-association/productivity-commission/PC/John-Maroney/smsf-sector/ASIC/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

11 January 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

As a year set to be dominated by new advice training standards for financial advisers begins, the SMSF Association has welcomed the Productivity Commission’s call for high advice standards for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to be enacted.

In its final report of its superannuation inquiry, which was publicly released yesterday, the Commission recommended higher advice standards be required for those giving SMSF-specific advice. This would reject the minimum balance approach previously used for ensuring the sustainability of the SMSF sector, although the Commission did warn that SMSFs with less than $500,000 performed significantly worse on average than regular funds.

This shift reflected long-held recommendations by the SMSF Association, which has pushed to ensure that SMSF advisers are appropriately educated.

“In our opinion, the Commission has got it right in describing a minimum balance requirement for establishing an SMSF as a ‘blunt tool’ that is far less likely to ensure a healthy SMSF sector compared with improving advice standards,” SMSF Association chief executive, John Maroney, said.

“So, we are fully supportive of its recommendation that the Government introduce requirements for specialist training for people providing advice to set up an SMSF.

“Raising the standards of SMSF advice through specific education requirements has long been the mantra of the Association, and a key focus in our mission to lead the professionalism, integrity and sustainability of the $755 billion SMSF sector.”

Maroney also said that the Commission’s above revised figure of $500,000 was “far more realistic to use as a guide of whether it is appropriate to establish an SMSF” than the more frequently cited $1 million.

The Commission also recommended that those advising on setting up SMSFs give prospective SMSF trustees a document outlining the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s ‘red flags’ before establishment, and extending the current proposed product design and distribution obligations to SMSF establishment.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 6 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 6 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

4 weeks ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3