Investors likely to lose money if emotional investing continues
Behavioural finance experts Oxford Risk have warned that the current economic, fiscal and stock market environment, plus the recent rise in crypto-assets valuations and retail trading, has created a situation where the risk of emotional investing has hit a new peak.
The firm said that, according to its estimations, on average emotional investing cost investors around 3% in lost returns a year over the long-term, but in the current crisis this would be higher.
Oxford Risk, which defined emotional investing as people acting on their behavioural impulses and emotionally buying and selling stocks and investments on the back of markets rising and falling, often pursued investments that they were familiar with such as companies that were highly publicised in the media, and those that recently announced large gains as in times of stress investors were seeking emotional comfort in investments which offered the promise of short-term returns.
Oxford Risk head of behavioural finance, Greg B Davies, warned that the current market situation created the perfect ‘storm’ for emotional investing, following the coronavirus crash in the first quarter of last year when stock markets saw big falls, followed by a bull market, with markets around the world rising.
“Optimism is higher because of hopes around the coronavirus vaccine roll-out and economic and fiscal stimulus programmes. However, there are huge economic problems ahead around unemployment and huge public spending deficits for example, so we should expect the unexpected in the markets over the coming months,” he said.
“The rise in the value of Bitcoin has also led to a crypto-assets ‘gold rush’, with retail investors piling into an incredibly volatile asset class that most don’t understand. The pandemic means many investors are currently highly emotionally sensitive and have a shortened emotional time horizon which increases the appeal of get-rich-quick gambles.”
Oxford Risk estimated that for those investors who increased their allocation to cash during these volatile times for markets, the cost of this ‘reluctance’ to invest is around 4% to 5% a year over the long-term. In addition, it estimated that the cost of the ‘behaviour gap’ – losses due to timing decisions caused by investing more money when times are good for stock markets and less when they are not “buy high and sell low” – is on average around 1.5% to 2% a year over time.
“Understanding of client financial personality is typically limited to risk profiling - often badly – and subjective human assessment. Very few wealth management propositions are using the sort of objective, science-based measures that are needed to provide a comprehensive picture of their clients. There is too much guesswork and not enough technology,” Davies said.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
