FPA questions ASIC licensing system
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has called for an investigation into the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) licensing system that allows product providers to hold their own Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).
In a submission to the parliamentary inquiry into agribusiness managed investments schemes (MIS), the FPA said a regulatory arrangement in which a product provider also holds an AFSL which authorises representatives to sell a single MIS product should be investigated in terms of its appropriateness.
“A key difference between agribusiness MIS and other financial products is the existence of dedicated sales networks to support sales of investments ...,” the submission stated.
The FPA questioned the quality of financial advice in such cases where an authorised representative was limited to recommending a single product. Financial planners must cover the full suite of client needs and, by definition, cannot be restricted to a single product distribution.
The FPA said consumers might be misled by distribution models that meet the regulatory standards of other participants but are dedicated sales channels for one product.
Financial planners' advice should have a reasonable basis and be appropriate to the client, the submission said.
Recommended for you
Multiple industry organisations have shared their thoughts on AFCA’s proposed rules amendment, supporting the idea of firms being named publicly when they fail to comply with determinations.
Channel Capital has appointed a head of investment oversight who joins from 14 years at asset consulting firm JANA Investment Advisers.
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
