Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Forex Capital sued for unconscionable conduct and conflicted remuneration

ASIC/forex-capital-trading/Forex-CT/OTC-derivatives/

17 July 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

The corporate watchdog has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives trader Forex Capital Trading and its sole director, Shlomo Yoshai.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) allege the firm engaged in a system of unconscionable conduct that was aided by Yoshai.

The alleged conduct would attract a maximum penalty of $420,000 for an individual and $2,100,000 for a body corporate.

This alleged conduct included:

  • Using high pressure sales tactics, such as offering incentives (credits and rebates) to encourage clients to transfer more money to Forex CT;
  • Recommending trading strategies that were inappropriate to clients;
  • Making false or misleading statements to clients;
  • Implementing and encouraging a trading floor culture that was directed towards maximising trading volume and client deposits rather than promoting a culture of compliance with applicable legal requirements;
  • Establishing and implementing incentives for clients to deposit funds and disincentives for clients to withdraw funds from their trading accounts; and
  • Failing to ensure compliance with financial services laws.

ASIC also alleged that the firm contravened a ban on conflicted remuneration under the Corporations Act by paying account manager bonuses primarily on client “net deposits” and failed to act in the best interests of clients when giving personal advice.

These contraventions could attract a maximum penalty of up to $1,000,000 for a body corporate.

ASIC also alleged that Yoshai failed to exercise his powers and discharge his duties as a director and this could attract a maximum penalty of $200,000.

“ASIC seeks declarations that Forex CT engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and, as the holder of an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, contravened its obligations under s912A of the Corporations Act,” ASIC said.

“This includes failing to do all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by the AFS licence were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 day 2 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks 5 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

3 days 20 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND