Fed Court upholds ASIC right on possible ban
The Federal Court has dismissed an application made by a former AMP financial planner to restrain the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) from making a decision on a possible financial services order against him.
In November 2015, ASIC expressed concerns related to advice given by Rommel Panganiban, a representative of AMP Financial Planning at that time, to around 50 of his clients.
Following the hearing, conducted by ASIC in March 2016, Panganiban requested the commission to provide him with further documents, including the client files to whom he had provided advice.
As ASIC declined to reveal these documents, on the basis of relevance and confidentiality obligations, Panganiban filed an application in the Federal Court seeking orders that ASIC provide him with the requested material and that ASIC be restrained from making a decision.
According to his application, he claimed that by failing to provide him with the client files, ASIC had denied him procedural fairness.
However, the Federal Court dismissed the application on the grounds that ASIC had not denied him natural justice by not providing him with the requested material and it is for ASIC to determine the matters and material on which it proposes to rely in making a banning decision, and which information should be disclosed to the banning candidate.
Additionally, Panganiban, a current authorised representative of Lionsgate Financial Group, was ordered to pay ASIC's costs.
A decision regarding ASIC's concerns and whether a banning order is appropriate is yet to be made by the ASIC delegate.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
ETF provider VanEck has announced its intention to launch a uranium and energy solution as global political agendas point to expansion in this sector.
PIMCO has announced the launch of a new active fixed-income ETF, marking its fifth active solution on the Australian market after the launch of four ETFs earlier in the year.
With the Australian advice market being a target for US private equity firms, a US advice commentator has shared lessons from his overseas experience, and why PE may be less attractive than initially expected.
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.
