Cutting the pay-for-ratings model could be a 'game changer'

research-houses/ASIC/financial-advisers/financial-services-industry/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/fund-manager/

21 June 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

With submissions still being considered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), it is essential that the financial services industry understands the potential ramifications of removing the current pay-for-ratings model of research houses, according to Zenith Investment Partners.

Submissions to ASIC's Consultation Paper 171 - Strengthening the regulation of research report providers (including research houses) - closed in February, but research providers are yet to be provided with any indication of how the regulatory guide will look.

According to John Nicoll, Zenith's national sales manager, key to the proposed guide will be ASIC's decision on the pay for ratings model, which could potentially be a "game changer" for the research houses.

He said if the regulator were to eliminate this model, the quality of fund reviews could fall dramatically.

"Potentially, the research that will be available to the market will be very simple, one page, quantitative driven research that's not going to add much value to financial advisers' businesses," he said.

Nicoll said a drop in the standards of the research process could also see more risky managed funds passing the review process and coming to market than is currently the case.

If ASIC makes the decision to completely cut the pay-for-ratings model, it needs to take into account every form of subsidy that a fund manager provides a research provider, including sponsorship and payment for data, he said.

"I think once ASIC looks a bit deeper - and they already are - they will realise most research houses are really tight when it comes to their review process."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 2 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

1 week 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has banned a former NSW adviser from providing advice for 10 years for investing at least $14.8 million into a cryptocurrency-based scam. ...

4 days 15 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3