Clicky

Cost and trust the major barriers to advice

Australians are generally better off when they receive financial advice but don’t know it until after they’ve gone through the process.

That is the bottom line of a white paper released by the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) at its national conference on the Gold Coast with the organisation’s chief executive, Phil Kewin noting that one of the key findings was that, in general, people who received financial advice paid less tax, had little or no bad debt and had their money working hard for them.

But the white paper also pointed to continuing existence of barriers to people obtaining advice including cost and the erosion of trust in the financial planning industry.

Related News:

The white paper, Great Advice for More Australians, was commissioned by the AFA and undertaken by CoreData based on a survey of 947 people between mid-August and early October, with Kewin claiming it demonstrated that financial advice led to better decisions which led to better financial outcomes.

He said that receiving advice also leads to better financial behaviours with one of the most important findings being that people who received financial advice believed they are more in control of their finances than those who did not.

"Of those surveyed, more than half (50.2 per cent) of those who receive advice believe they could survive financially for more than six months if they were unable to work, whereas only around a quarter (26.2 per cent) of those who did not receive advice said the same thing."

Kewin said the challenge for the advice profession now was to overcome the two barriers to advice.

"The cost of advice is a very real barrier for some people," he said. "Another barrier is the erosion of trust in our industry.”

“That said, it is encouraging that the White Paper reveals 72 per cent of people who have never received financial advice would consider it. As a profession, we need to think about how we can work to overcome these twin challenges and deliver financial advice to a community that clearly has an appetite for it."
 




Related Content

Product intervention power will increase cost of advice

Handing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) product intervention powers could end up restricting advisers as a result of licen...Read more

Planner hours should be billable during Professional Year

Financial planners doing their professional year must be capable of generating income or too few advice firms will be willing to take them on, accordi...Read more

Foreign degrees problematic for planners

Financial planners with foreign tertiary degrees stand to be disadvantaged under the legislative and regulatory arrangements being utilised by the Fin...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Two observations on this would be, as a sole practioner I need to earn $100,000 per annum just to open the doors, this includes licensing, PI, rent, rates, insurances etc but doesn't even cover wages and super. Then on top of that the government takes 10% of everything I earn straight away under the GST regime. These costs need to be passed on.

Secondly, if we are going to upskill via education, ethics courses etc over the coming years and become the profession we have always been and the research proves that people who seek advice are better off, why are advice fees not tax deductible? It doesn't make a great deal of sense to me that negative gearing is tax deductible when the actual advice is not. Keen to hear what others think

I agree that financial advice should be tax deductible. The problem is the industry has NO credibility in the eye of the politicians and regulators.

Thanks to the Big 4 banks' and AMP's financial planning arms conduct; we are all tarred with the same brush. Is it fair? Hell, no. But fairness ends when certain organisations openly say, "We charge dead people life insurance premiums," and agree that this conduct is unacceptable.

The only good thing is that the industry is going to burned to the ground and rebuilt, brick by brick. Now if only we could do the same to its regulators ….

Add new comment