Call for single-product licensing to be banned
The collapse of Great Southern should serve as a salutary lesson to the industry of the dangers of single product licensing of financial advisers, according to CPA Australia's senior policy adviser for superannuation, Michael Davison.
“A key issue coming out of the collapse of Great Southern is that it was able to licence people as authorised representatives on the basis of selling a single product to the investing public.
“As an adviser, how can you properly assess clients’ needs and risks if you are not licensed or authorised to recommend alternative products.
“Are they really acting in clients’ best interest in this instance?"
Davison said the CPA has made the call for this licensing to be outlawed in a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee inquiry into corporations and financial services.
He acknowledged that the call had been motivated partly by the experience of having had 80 CPA members who were exposed to the Great Southern licence.
“There were approximately 300 accountants and another 800 financial planners that sold the Great Southern product," he said.
Davison did not know whether there are other providers currently that have authorised representatives on the basis of a single product.
“That’s beside the point, however, as our greater concern is there are organisations out there that can authorise advisers for a single purpose, to sell one product."
Recommended for you
The popularity of ETFs, which are approaching $200 billion in Australia, is a potential threat to the advice landscape if consumers opt to invest directly, according to this senior partner.
A former AMP financial adviser has urged advisers in the BOLR class action against AMP to object to the “unfair and unreasonable” $100 million settlement sum as the objection deadline approaches on 22 May.
Two Victoria-based financial advice practices have merged and rebranded as Forbes Fava Saville Financial Planning, as the firm realises the benefits of added scale.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made its latest ruling over a case involving an incorrect Statement of Advice.