Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank small business contract terms declared unfair

Bendigo-and-Adelaide-Bank/ASIC/banking/

1 June 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

Several terms within six small business contracts used by Bendigo and Adelaide Bank have been declared unfair by the Federal Court of Australia, following an investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC said the contracts were standard form small business loan contracts which the bank entered into with its customers after 12 November, 2016. The regulator was also successful in having the court declare the same terms as unfair in other standard form small business contracts.

An ASIC announcement said the bank would give an undertaking to the court not to use or rely on any of the impugned terms in a manner that was unfair, or cause customers to suffer loss or damage.

Justice Gleeson said the unfair terms:

  • Caused a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract;
  • Were not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank; and
  • Would cause detriment to the small businesses if the terms were relied on.

“ASIC’s investigation revealed that some of the unfair terms gave the bank broad discretion to unilaterally vary the terms and conditions of the contract without giving the borrower advance notice, or an opportunity to exit the contract without penalty,” the announcement said.

“Other terms allowed the bank to take disproportionate actions in response to a breach by the borrower, for example, by calling a default without giving the borrower an opportunity to remedy a breach, or by calling a default based on events that do not present any material risk to the bank.”

The court also ordered the terms to be void from the outset, and that the unfair terms be replaced.

ASIC Commissioner Sean Hughes said: “Yesterday’s judgment shows that ASIC will take the necessary steps to enforce the law. Importantly, insurance firms should be preparing to extend these obligations in insurance contracts.

“We are pleased the Government backed us with additional funding that was ear-marked to enforce this area of the law.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 weeks 2 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 weeks 3 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

3 weeks ago

As the deadline approaches for advisers to meet higher education requirements, the FAAA has shared an “obscure” loophole to help advisers avoid redoing a professional yea...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3