ASIC's MDA class order needs a review: IMAP

ASIC/financial-adviser/investments-commission/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chairman/

8 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The 2004 class order issued under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) managed discretionary account (MDA) policy needs to be reviewed to better clarify what activity is permitted within a regulated platform as opposed to a full MDA authorisation.

That's the assessment of Toby Potter, chairman of the Institute of Managed Account Providers (IMAP), who recently met with the regulator to discuss the progress of the MDA Consultation Paper, which he said he expects will be released some time before the year's end.

The current model of a financial adviser providing a discretionary management service through a platform is not well captured in the class order, he said.

Potter added that some of the reporting requirements under the no-action letter are redundant, due to the fact that custody arrangements and regular reporting requirements are usually met by the existence of a platform.

"The issues for us are making sure that the regulations reflect current practices in administration and platform technology," he said.

According to The Fold Legal managing director Claire Wivell-Platter, ASIC seems to be of the view that the no-action letter was limited to rebalancing portfolios, whereas she understands that financial advisers have been using the class order to provide a more widespread discretionary management service.

"I believe the reason for this is at the time the letter was issued, equities weren't readily available on platforms, but since then they have been," she said.

"It's conceivable that the terms of the no-action letter are wide enough, because it does not specifically say that the activities should be limited to rebalancing."

With such a lack of clarity around the MDA authorisation, Wivell-Platter suggests that the regulator introduce a limited authorisation to discretionary services provided on a platform, since an adviser would already meet the administrative and reporting requirements under the no-action letter.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 6 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

6 days 3 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo