ASIC signals that admin assistance to clients is not actually advice

ASIC advice Parliament Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services

18 January 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has stopped well short of confirming that the provision of administrative assistance to financial planning clients can actually be deemed the provision of advice.

Asked specifically whether ASIC’s definition of advice included “the provision of ongoing administration assistance, and not just the provision of an annual Review document”, ASIC’s response to a Parliamentary Committee was highly equivocal.

The response, provided Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, was made just weeks ahead of the Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and the Digital Economy, Senator Jane Hume, specifically urging financial advisers to provide their feedback to ASIC as part of its affordable project.

However, ASIC made clear to Queensland Liberal backbencher, Bert Van Mannen, that the provision of administrative assistance could not be specifically referenced and charged out in the same terms as the provision of financial advice.

ASIC outlined what the relevant legislation currently says and suggested that the provision of ongoing administration assistance might fall short of those requirements.

“Financial product advice is defined in s766B of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) as a recommendation or a statement of opinion, or a report of either of those things, that:

(a) is intended to influence a person or persons in making a decision in relation to a particular financial product or class of financial products, or an interest in a particular financial product or class of financial products; or

(b) could reasonably be regarded as being intended to have such an influence.”

“Whether or not the provision of ongoing administration assistance meets the legal definition of advice turns on what those services involve,” ASIC told Van Mannen. “However, if the services provided do not meet the above definition, for example, assisting a client update or change their contact details with product issuers for the investments they hold, those services would not be considered financial product advice.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

2 days 1 hour ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

2 days 22 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

2 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND