ASIC issues civil penalty action against Equiti FS
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil penalty proceedings in Federal Court against DOD Bookkeeping, now in liquidation, previously known as Equiti Financial Services (Equiti FS).
ASIC alleged Equiti FS breached the prohibition against conflicted remuneration and failed to provide appropriate financial advice and discharge its best interests duty in relation to financial advice to selected clients.
Equiti FS was part of a group of companies called Equiti Group which offered self-managed super fund (SMSF) establishment.
ASIC alleged that between 26 October, 2015, to 27 August, 2018, Equiti FS paid three advisers bonuses totally $164,750 upon settlement of property purchases those advisers recommended their clients make through either an existing SMSF or an SMSF to be established.
The bonuses applied to purchases arranged by Equiti Property, another company part of Equiti Group.
ASIC alleged these bonuses breached the ban on conflicted remuneration under the Corporations Act 2001 because they could reasonably be expected to influence the financial product advice provided or choice of product recommended.
It was also alleged between 18 May, 2015, and 13 February, 2018, it breached the Corporations Act when its employed advisers gave financial advice on 12 occasions that was not in their clients best interests and was not appropriate for their clients.
Each advice contained a recommendation to establish an SMSF, purchase a property through the SMSF and borrow funds to do so.
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
