ASIC issues civil penalty action against Equiti FS
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil penalty proceedings in Federal Court against DOD Bookkeeping, now in liquidation, previously known as Equiti Financial Services (Equiti FS).
ASIC alleged Equiti FS breached the prohibition against conflicted remuneration and failed to provide appropriate financial advice and discharge its best interests duty in relation to financial advice to selected clients.
Equiti FS was part of a group of companies called Equiti Group which offered self-managed super fund (SMSF) establishment.
ASIC alleged that between 26 October, 2015, to 27 August, 2018, Equiti FS paid three advisers bonuses totally $164,750 upon settlement of property purchases those advisers recommended their clients make through either an existing SMSF or an SMSF to be established.
The bonuses applied to purchases arranged by Equiti Property, another company part of Equiti Group.
ASIC alleged these bonuses breached the ban on conflicted remuneration under the Corporations Act 2001 because they could reasonably be expected to influence the financial product advice provided or choice of product recommended.
It was also alleged between 18 May, 2015, and 13 February, 2018, it breached the Corporations Act when its employed advisers gave financial advice on 12 occasions that was not in their clients best interests and was not appropriate for their clients.
Each advice contained a recommendation to establish an SMSF, purchase a property through the SMSF and borrow funds to do so.
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
While the August financial advice exam saw a lower pass rate of 62 per cent compared with 70 per cent in previous sittings, this expert believes it’s for a positive reason.
With the FY24 reporting season behind us, five major financial advice licensees are looking to achieve growth either through inorganic activity or internal expansion.
An alleged involvement with an insurance claims business has led the Federal Court to vary the orders of a banned adviser to add the threat of jail time.
The investment platform has announced several improvements, enabling advisers to create more bespoke solutions for clients as well as further exclusion options.
